
Integrated Water Process plans, specifies and supplies commercial hydroponic and greenhouse water treatment systems for controlled-environment agriculture (CEA) facilities. We develop treatment approaches around source-water quality, irrigation demand, nutrient strategy and the requirements of the complete water process.
Our Total Water Management approach connects source-water filtration, conditioning, membrane treatment and microbial-control requirements with storage, pumping, nutrient delivery, irrigation and controls. The agreed project scope defines the equipment, engineering, integration and support included.
The objective is to provide a consistent and predictable water supply that meets the facility’s operating requirements. Treatment selection starts with the water and its intended use, rather than a standard equipment package.
Precision cultivation starts with defined targets for treated-water quality, flow and pressure. The project should establish acceptable deviations, monitoring requirements and corrective actions when operating conditions fall outside those limits.
Suspended solids, hardness, alkalinity, dissolved minerals, disinfectants, metals, organic material and microbial conditions can influence nutrient formulation, irrigation performance, equipment reliability and maintenance. Different water-quality concerns require different treatment methods.
IWP evaluates the source water and the cultivation process to determine what needs to be removed, reduced or controlled. Water analysis, particle loading and operating observations help establish the treatment requirements before major equipment decisions are made.
Our water testing and analysis services can help characterize source or process water and provide a basis for treatment planning.
Treatment can reduce variability in the water entering nutrient preparation and irrigation. Source-water alkalinity, hardness and dissolved constituents should be accounted for when developing the treatment process and nutrient strategy.
The required water quality depends on the crop, growing method and operating objectives. Consistent source-water chemistry gives growers a more predictable basis for nutrient formulation without assuming that every facility needs the same treatment level.
Particulate removal and control of scale-forming constituents can reduce clogging and buildup in pumps, valves, flow meters, sensors, nutrient-delivery equipment and irrigation emitters. The treatment specification should account for the smallest or most sensitive downstream passages and the water chemistry those components can tolerate.
Filters also introduce pressure loss, which can increase as they load. Treatment capacity, pumping, cleaning cycles and controls should therefore be coordinated with the required irrigation flow and pressure. Learn more about IWP’s commercial irrigation systems.
Whether you are evaluating a new facility, troubleshooting an existing system or planning an upgrade, tell us about your water source, treatment concerns and project stage. We can help define the water-quality requirements and the appropriate planning or design scope.
Treatment equipment should work with the rest of the facility, from source water and storage through pumping, nutrient delivery, irrigation and controls. Process sequencing, treatment production rates and operating schedules affect whether the system can supply water when it is needed.
Water storage can provide equalization between source availability, treatment production and irrigation demand. Pumping systems must account for treatment pressure loss, downstream demand and any backwash or cleaning requirements.
Backwash water, membrane concentrate, spent filter elements and other treatment outputs need a defined handling path. Where recovery is proposed, the treatment design should be coordinated with the facility’s water reclamation and recovery strategy.
Commercial CEA facilities may use several technologies as a treatment train. Selection depends on source-water chemistry, particle loading, required flow, irrigation strategy, treated-water demand, recovery objectives and operating cost.
For definitions of water-process terms, visit the IWP water-process glossary.
RO is a pressure-driven membrane process used to reduce dissolved salts and other dissolved constituents. It can be appropriate where source-water chemistry requires substantial dissolved-solids reduction to meet crop or process requirements.
RO planning includes feed-water quality, pretreatment, membrane recovery, permeate demand, storage, operating pressure, cleaning and concentrate management. The concentrate or reject stream needs a defined disposal, treatment or recovery path. RO performance and operating cost should be assessed for the proposed system.
Screen, disc, media, depth and cartridge filters can remove suspended solids such as sand, silt and organic debris. Centrifugal separation may also be appropriate for some particle characteristics and operating conditions.
Filter type and rating should be selected around source-water conditions, required flow, allowable pressure loss, downstream equipment and cleaning requirements. Manual or automatic cleaning should be matched to the operating duty and particle loading.

Microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) use membrane barriers for finer suspended-solids separation. They can reduce microorganisms depending on the membrane, system integrity and operating conditions, and may be used as pretreatment before another membrane process.
These technologies do not perform the same dissolved-salts reduction as RO. Water chemistry must still be evaluated separately from suspended-solids and microbial requirements.
Nanofiltration (NF) is a pressure-driven membrane process between UF and RO. It can reduce selected dissolved constituents and may be useful where partial softening or selective ion reduction is appropriate.
Actual rejection depends on the membrane, water chemistry and operating conditions. NF should be evaluated against the required finished-water quality rather than treated as a universal substitute for RO.
Where source-water chemistry requires adjustment, the treatment plan should coordinate conditioning with nutrient formulation, equipment compatibility and monitoring. The method and operating requirements should be defined for the application.
Filtration and disinfection serve different purposes. Particulate filtration alone should not be assumed to provide disinfection. Where microbial control is required, filtration may be combined with UV, an oxidizing disinfectant, heat or another method appropriate for the water quality and intended use. The treatment plan should define performance verification and the response when operating conditions fall outside the intended range.
IWP reviews source-water quality, peak and daily demand, nutrient strategy, downstream equipment, storage, controls, maintenance access and facility objectives. An evaluation of an existing system also considers operating data and the conditions associated with the problem being investigated.
Alkalinity, hardness, sodium, chloride, dissolved minerals, disinfectants and other constituents may influence the finished nutrient solution. The treatment objective is to establish a suitable and predictable starting point for nutrient formulation while protecting the irrigation process.
The system should meet the expected demand across relevant operating conditions. Design considers available pressure, treatment production rate, irrigation schedules, pressure loss, cleaning or backwash demand and future capacity. Multiple treatment stages and storage may be needed to coordinate production with peak use.
Housings, membranes, seals, media and other wetted components should be compatible with the water chemistry and treatment or cleaning chemicals. Equipment ratings, manufacturer requirements, isolation, drains, sampling points and service clearances should be reviewed before selection.
Maintenance depends on the technology, loading, operating hours and manufacturer guidance. Differential pressure, flow, treated-water quality, membrane performance and inspection findings can help define when cleaning, service or replacement is required.
Treatment options should be compared against their energy demand, consumables, cleaning requirements, waste streams and operating costs. Opportunities for water recovery or reduced waste depend on the actual facility and treatment process. Expected savings should be evaluated alongside the water quality and operating performance required.
There is no single best system for every facility. Source-water chemistry, particle loading, required flow and pressure, crop requirements, downstream equipment, operating preferences and budget determine the appropriate treatment train. Different stages may be needed for suspended solids, dissolved constituents and microbial concerns.
No. RO is appropriate when dissolved constituents need to be reduced to meet the required water quality. Some facilities may need only particulate filtration, while others may benefit from NF, RO, conditioning or another process. Water analysis and the application requirements should drive the decision.
Service intervals depend on equipment type, water quality, loading, operating hours and manufacturer requirements. Differential pressure, flow, treated-water quality, membrane performance, cleaning frequency and inspection findings are useful indicators. A fixed monthly inspection or quarterly service schedule is not suitable for every system.
Commercial equipment is available across a wide range of capacities. It must be selected and sized for the actual flow, pressure, treatment objectives and cleaning requirements. Treated-water storage can help coordinate treatment production with peak irrigation demand where the system design supports that approach.
Some membrane technologies can reduce microorganisms, but performance depends on the membrane, system condition and operating requirements. Particulate filtration alone should not be assumed to provide disinfection. The process should include appropriate treatment, monitoring and performance verification where microbial control is required.
Often, yes. An upgrade should review source water, operating data, flow and pressure, available space, pumps, storage, controls and downstream equipment. This helps determine whether the issue involves suspended solids, dissolved constituents, microbial risk, capacity or a combination of concerns.
Source-water testing and system evaluation are often the first steps toward an effective treatment strategy. Tell us about your facility, existing water system and project objectives so we can discuss the appropriate next step.
Email service@waterprocess.com with your location, project stage and any available water analyses, flow requirements, equipment information or facility drawings.